In a world where many businesses chase profits, a trending Scoop Upworthy story sheds light on a harsh reality: some owners rake in huge earnings while their employees struggle on low pay. The article highlights how easy it is for employers to keep far more of their profits by paying workers minimum or “starvation” wages, just enough to get by, but not enough to thrive. It argues that this model is common because most bosses would rather protect their own income than share the wealth with the people who help generate it.
Key Takeaways:
- Many business owners significantly increase their personal profits by paying employees minimum or “starvation” wages.
- Paying low wages is often a choice, not a necessity, as shown by owners who admit they could earn much more by underpaying staff.
- Madeline Pendleton, owner of Tunnel Vision, proves an alternative model works by paying all employees a $70,000 salary and working a four-day week.
- Fair wages improve employee well-being, loyalty, and workplace culture while challenging exploitative labor norms.
- The story raises a larger ethical question: should businesses operate if they cannot afford to pay workers a living wage?
The piece centers on a small business owner, Madeline Pendleton, who stands out by doing the opposite. At her clothing brand and vintage shop, Tunnel Vision, she pays every employee, including herself, a $70,000 annual salary, along with a four-day workweek. That’s far above local minimum standards and significantly more than many workers in similar roles normally earn. Pendleton explains that if she paid only minimum wage, she could have kept roughly $420,000 more for herself, a striking example of the profit gap many business owners choose to maintain.
Instead, Pendleton opts to share profits fairly, even buying cars for employees when the company does well. She says this approach isn’t only ethical, it’s also smart business practice. Her viewpoint challenges a system where owners accumulate wealth while laborers receive minimal compensation. According to labor research, wage violations and underpayment affect a large share of low-wage workers, with many losing thousands annually due to unfair pay practices.
This payment gap, where owners keep the majority of earnings while employees barely cover basic living costs, reflects broader labor market issues. Many workers report wages that don’t keep up with inflation or the actual cost of living, forcing them into multiple jobs, extra hours, or even debt just to make ends meet.
Critics of low-wage business models argue that when companies rely on workers earning just enough to survive, the entire system tilts unfairly toward owners. Sociologists sometimes describe this imbalance as a form of wage exploitation, where the value workers create far exceeds what they receive, leaving the surplus in the hands of the owners.
In contrast, Pendleton’s approach shows a different path: one where business success and employee well-being go hand in hand. Fair wages and shared profit can boost morale, reduce turnover, and create a healthier workplace culture. While not all companies have embraced this model, stories like hers prompt a broader question: Should businesses exist if they can’t afford to pay people wages that support a decent life? Many advocates would say that fair compensation isn’t just ethical, it’s essential for a sustainable economy. If stories like this make you reflect on fairness, ethics, and mindful living, explore more thought-provoking content at Simply Wholesome. We share meaningful stories that encourage awareness, compassion, and positive change in everyday life.
Leave a comment